Compare Predictions from Different Analyses

First Multipole Solution:

GW Fit (s,p-wave) (BMLP) GW Fit (s,p,d-wave) (BMLD)
RPI Fit (Low-Energy) (RPBM) Hanstein (Low-Energy) (M1BM)
MAID (Low-Energy) (M2BM) Dyn. Model (Low-Energy) (M3BM)
MAID (High-Energy) (M4BM) Dyn. Model (High-Energy) (M5BM)
Aznauryan (Low-Energy) (YEBM) Omelaenko (Low-Energy) (KLBM)

Second Multipole Solution:

GW Fit (Low-Energy s,p-wave) GW Fit (Low-Energy s,p,d-wave)
GW Fit (High-Energy f-wave) RPI Fit (Low-Energy)
Hanstein (Low-Energy) MAID (Low-Energy)
Dyn. Model (Low-Energy) MAID (High-Energy)
Dyn. Model (High-Energy) Aznauryan (Low-Energy)
Omelaenko (Low-Energy)

   Note: Comparisons will be devoid of meaning if either solution is
         extrapolated beyond its range of validity. The second solution
         is labeled on the figure and plotted in a light blue colour.
         Data references may be found using the "Observables" page.

Choose a Reaction Type:

PI0_P PI+_N

Choose Observables:

DSG P S T
E F G H

Enter independent variable:

Acm CosA Elab Wcm

...[Lower]...[Increment]...[Upper]...Range of Independent Variable

Enter fixed variable:

Acm Elab Wcm

Value of fixed variable:

....[Lower]......[Upper]...Range of Plotted Data

Change the Database

Full Database Benchmark Set

(For the total cross section the upper/lower limits are 0 for Acm)